News

Share & Bookmark, Press Enter to show all options, press Tab go to next option
Print

Cities Expressing Opposition or Concern Regarding AB 1768

Post Date:05/21/2026 12:45 PM

PRESS RELEASE

May 21, 2026

For Immediate Release

Media Contact:
Kindon Meik, City Manager
City of Calabasas, CA
kmeik@cityofcalabasas.com

Cities Warn Proposed Sales Tax Cap Increase Threatens Local Fiscal Management, Municipal Services, and Taxpayer Confidence

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA — A growing number of cities throughout Los Angeles County are voicing opposition to AB 1768, legislation that would increase the allowable sales tax cap in Los Angeles County and create the potential for additional countywide sales tax increases.

This will be the third time in Los Angeles County that legislative or statutory mechanisms allowing additional countywide sales tax increases have been pursued, including prior transportation-related measures and the 2023 exemption authorizing Measure A.

Cities expressing opposition or concern regarding AB 1768 include representatives and officials from:

  • City of Arcadia
  • City of Artesia
  • City of Azusa
  • City of Bradbury
  • City of Calabasas
  • City of Carson
  • City of Glendale
  • City of Glendora
  • City of Hidden Hills
  • City of La Verne
  • City of Lakewood
  • City of Lomita
  • City of Malibu
  • City of Palos Verdes Estates
  • City of Rancho Palos Verdes
  • City of Rolling Hills Estates
  • City of San Fernando
  • City of Westlake Village
  • League of California Cities – LA County Division

City leaders throughout the region are raising concerns that AB 1768 continues a troubling pattern of repeated legislative increases in local sales tax caps, reducing cities' future flexibility to address essential municipal priorities.

Furthermore, cities across Los Angeles County are already facing unprecedented fiscal pressures, including rising costs related to public safety, infrastructure, emergency preparedness, homelessness response, and aging facilities.  Preserving financial management over remaining revenue options is critical to maintaining essential services residents depend upon every day.

The coalition emphasized that opposition to AB 1768 is not opposition to healthcare funding or regional services. Legislators should prioritize a statewide solution to backfill healthcare cuts caused by H.R.1, rather than a piecemeal approach for individual counties that leave service gaps for millions of Californians. Instead, cities are concerned about the cumulative impact of continually increasing local sales tax caps through Sacramento legislation.

Key concerns raised by cities include:

  • Reduced local flexibility and return for taxpayer-generated revenue
  • Diminished ability for cities to pursue future local funding measures
  • Increased voter fatigue and declining public trust regarding taxation
  • Undue impact that increased sales tax has on already fiscally challenged working class residents

The coalition also expressed concern that repeated increases in the sales tax cap undermine long-term municipal financial planning and make it more difficult for local governments to responsibly prepare for future infrastructure and service demands.

Local governments are closest to the residents they serve. Communities deserve the ability to make local decisions about local priorities without continually reducing the financial flexibility available to cities.

The cities are urging legislators and Governor Gavin Newsom to oppose AB 1768 and preserve local fiscal flexibility for municipalities throughout Los Angeles County.

ABOUT THE COALITION

The coalition consists of local governments, city leaders, and municipal representatives throughout Los Angeles County working collaboratively to advocate for local management of tax measure revenue, responsible fiscal policy, and the long-term sustainability of essential municipal services.

The coalition represents a group of cities working to fulfill the priorities and expectations of their individual communities. Each city is unique and establishes priorities based on the specific needs of its residents, businesses, infrastructure, public safety demands, and local economy. Coalition members believe local governments are entrusted to responsibly steward taxpayer dollars in a manner that residents and businesses trust, value, and expect from their local elected leaders.

arcadia City Seal
Arcadia


Official Seal

Artesia


Azusa Seal - High Resolution - Transparent Background


Azusa

seal_Bradbury

Bradbury

Seal_of_Calabasas,_California


Calabasas

New Carson City Seal _ Blue and Gold


Carson

gold seal
Glendale

City-Seal-Color_PNG

Glendora

HH_Seal_80x80
Hidden Hills

revised colorseal resized (white text)
La Verne

city logo
Lakewood

City Logo Hi Resolution No Background
Lomita

Malibu City Seal
Malibu

PVE Logo-2[20]

Palos Verdes Estates

RPV_logo_color_with initials_small

Rancho Palos Verdes

RollingHillsEstatesLogo

Rolling Hills Estates

City Seal Logo OUTLINE DARK BLUE

San Fernando

 Color Seal

 
Westlake Village


 

Los Angeles County Division Logo

League of California Cities – LA County Division

 

 

Return to full list >>